TakingITGlobal

2025-2026 Connected North Program Report

Issue link: https://takingitglobal.uberflip.com/i/1545934

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 25 of 33

Evaluation Questions 1. Is the program targeting the right outcomes? 2. Is the program well-designed? 3. Is the outcomes chain reasonable? 4. Is the program being implemented as designed? 5. Does the program appear to be contributing to its intended short- and medium-term outcomes? Evaluation Done Using Mixed-Methods Approach Semi-structured Key Informant Interviews: 4 participating principals 7 Connected North staff 8 Content Providers 16 participating teachers Quantitative and qualitative analysis of surveys collected by Connected North: Annual Teacher Surveys (N=1157*) Ongoing Content Provider Surveys (N=920*) Post-session Student Surveys (N=2992*) Literature review Results Overall, the evaluation finds that Connected North is: appropriately targeting its intended outcomes (Q1); is well designed (Q2); and is being implemented largely as intended (Q4). Given that the underlying program theory is robust (Q3), the program can reasonably be claimed to contribute to its intended outcomes. Adeboye, R., Flewelling, C., Ogbole, V., & O'Sullivan, E. (2026, January). Connected North: Evaluation report. Public Policy and Program Evaluation, Carleton University. Source

Articles in this issue

view archives of TakingITGlobal - 2025-2026 Connected North Program Report