Whose Land? www.whose.land
Criteria EXEMPLARY (5) PROFICIENT (3)
NEARING
PROFICIENT (2)
NOVICE (0)
Honouring
Indigenous
history
A perfect LA would: A good LA would: A developing LA
would:
An incomplete LA
would:
Personal and
Original
A perfect LA would: A good LA would: A developing LA
would:
An incomplete LA
would:
Organization
The ideas are arranged
logically. They flow
smoothly from one to
another and are clearly
linked to each other.
The writer's intentions
are very clear.
The ideas are arranged
logically They are
usually clearly linked
to each other. For the
most part, the reader
can follow the line of
reasoning. The writer's
intentions are clear.
In general, the writing
is arranged logically,
although occasion-
ally ideas fail to make
sense together. The
writer's intentions are
somewhat clear
The writing is not
logically organized.
Frequently, ideas fail to
make sense together.
The writer's intentions
are confusing.
Sentence
Structure
Sentences are well-
phrased and varied in
length and structure.
They flow smoothly
from one to another.
Word choice is
accurate.
Sentences are well-
phrased and there
is some variety in
length and structure.
Word choice is mostly
accurate.
Some sentences are
awkwardly constructed
so that the reader is
occasionally distracted.
Sentence flow is
developing.
Word choice can be
strengthened.
Errors in sentence
structure are frequent
enough to be a major
distraction to the
reader. No flow and
frequently distracting
grammatical errors.
Proof of
Revision
The writing is free of
errors.
There are occasional
errors, but they don't
represent a major
distraction or obscure
meaning.
The writing has many
errors, and the reader
is distracted by them.
There are so many
errors that the mean-
ing is obscured. The
reader is confused and
stops reading.
LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT RUBRIC
